Trait sp_std::iter::FromIterator 1.0.0[−][src]
pub trait FromIterator<A> { fn from_iter<T>(iter: T) -> Self
where
T: IntoIterator<Item = A>; }
Expand description
Conversion from an Iterator
.
By implementing FromIterator
for a type, you define how it will be
created from an iterator. This is common for types which describe a
collection of some kind.
FromIterator::from_iter()
is rarely called explicitly, and is instead
used through Iterator::collect()
method. See Iterator::collect()
’s
documentation for more examples.
See also: IntoIterator
.
Examples
Basic usage:
use std::iter::FromIterator; let five_fives = std::iter::repeat(5).take(5); let v = Vec::from_iter(five_fives); assert_eq!(v, vec![5, 5, 5, 5, 5]);
Using Iterator::collect()
to implicitly use FromIterator
:
let five_fives = std::iter::repeat(5).take(5); let v: Vec<i32> = five_fives.collect(); assert_eq!(v, vec![5, 5, 5, 5, 5]);
Implementing FromIterator
for your type:
use std::iter::FromIterator; // A sample collection, that's just a wrapper over Vec<T> #[derive(Debug)] struct MyCollection(Vec<i32>); // Let's give it some methods so we can create one and add things // to it. impl MyCollection { fn new() -> MyCollection { MyCollection(Vec::new()) } fn add(&mut self, elem: i32) { self.0.push(elem); } } // and we'll implement FromIterator impl FromIterator<i32> for MyCollection { fn from_iter<I: IntoIterator<Item=i32>>(iter: I) -> Self { let mut c = MyCollection::new(); for i in iter { c.add(i); } c } } // Now we can make a new iterator... let iter = (0..5).into_iter(); // ... and make a MyCollection out of it let c = MyCollection::from_iter(iter); assert_eq!(c.0, vec![0, 1, 2, 3, 4]); // collect works too! let iter = (0..5).into_iter(); let c: MyCollection = iter.collect(); assert_eq!(c.0, vec![0, 1, 2, 3, 4]);
Required methods
fn from_iter<T>(iter: T) -> Self where
T: IntoIterator<Item = A>,
fn from_iter<T>(iter: T) -> Self where
T: IntoIterator<Item = A>,
Creates a value from an iterator.
See the module-level documentation for more.
Examples
Basic usage:
use std::iter::FromIterator; let five_fives = std::iter::repeat(5).take(5); let v = Vec::from_iter(five_fives); assert_eq!(v, vec![5, 5, 5, 5, 5]);
Implementations on Foreign Types
impl<K, V, S> FromIterator<(K, V)> for HashMap<K, V, S> where
K: Eq + Hash,
S: BuildHasher + Default,
impl<K, V, S> FromIterator<(K, V)> for HashMap<K, V, S> where
K: Eq + Hash,
S: BuildHasher + Default,
Collapses all unit items from an iterator into one.
This is more useful when combined with higher-level abstractions, like
collecting to a Result<(), E>
where you only care about errors:
use std::io::*; let data = vec![1, 2, 3, 4, 5]; let res: Result<()> = data.iter() .map(|x| writeln!(stdout(), "{}", x)) .collect(); assert!(res.is_ok());
Takes each element in the Iterator
: if it is None
,
no further elements are taken, and the None
is
returned. Should no None
occur, a container with the
values of each Option
is returned.
Examples
Here is an example which increments every integer in a vector.
We use the checked variant of add
that returns None
when the
calculation would result in an overflow.
let items = vec![0_u16, 1, 2]; let res: Option<Vec<u16>> = items .iter() .map(|x| x.checked_add(1)) .collect(); assert_eq!(res, Some(vec![1, 2, 3]));
As you can see, this will return the expected, valid items.
Here is another example that tries to subtract one from another list of integers, this time checking for underflow:
let items = vec![2_u16, 1, 0]; let res: Option<Vec<u16>> = items .iter() .map(|x| x.checked_sub(1)) .collect(); assert_eq!(res, None);
Since the last element is zero, it would underflow. Thus, the resulting
value is None
.
Here is a variation on the previous example, showing that no
further elements are taken from iter
after the first None
.
let items = vec![3_u16, 2, 1, 10]; let mut shared = 0; let res: Option<Vec<u16>> = items .iter() .map(|x| { shared += x; x.checked_sub(2) }) .collect(); assert_eq!(res, None); assert_eq!(shared, 6);
Since the third element caused an underflow, no further elements were taken,
so the final value of shared
is 6 (= 3 + 2 + 1
), not 16.